Gil Scott-Heron’s 1970 spoken word poem, “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised,” is ultimately a warning against confusing the representation of change with change itself. He also described the revolution as something that takes place in one's consciousness—something cameras cannot capture. The extraordinary thing about the phrase is that it has escaped its original moment and serves as a much broader meditation on how genuine transformation happens. It requires changes in consciousness, changes in relationships and practices, changes in communities and institutions.
Bottom line: transformation requires something from us. What might that be?
In this context I would like to invite you into an ongoing conversation about white supremacy. Let’s begin with a key distinction: In this conversation, white supremacy as a cultural system, is a historically developed pattern of social norms, institutions, and narratives that has privileged people identified as white and treated whiteness as a normative or dominant position, at the same time subordinating or marginalizing people identified with other racial groups. It is not referring to an ideology of individual racial prejudice or as membership in an extremist organization.
White supremacy as a cultural system has institutionally distributed power, resources, status, and credibility based on a racial hierarchy. In the United States, white supremacy has taken both explicit and implicit forms. Explicit forms include slavery, racial terror, mandated segregation, racial exclusion from citizenship, and openly racialized political doctrines. More implicit forms can persist through institutional practices, inherited inequalities, cultural assumptions, and historical narratives even after explicitly racial laws have been abolished.
This distinction matters because saying that white supremacy is a cultural system does not mean that every white person consciously believes in white superiority. The systemic concept concerns patterns of power and cultural norms that can operate independently of an individual's intentions. In this broader sense, the term describes a system of social relationships—not simply individual attitudes. It can operate through laws and institutions, but also through cultural norms, historical narratives and who controls that narrative.
